> ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.Pages: 1 2
........................................................................
ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
Extreme Chick: seems nice, but those stupid fuqing tildes are ANNOYING.
Austin Girl: the jowls, gunt, and vaginal scarring are gross, but the constant attention whoring was the worst. Second only to Cat at attention whoring.
Cat: the biggest attention whore on the board and a petty vindictive qunt. Her one saving grace is that she really knows how to irritate Austin Gunt.
sweetpea/beautiful flower: likely imaginary, one of Spanky's characters; no one on earth would ever screw Spanky.
TACM: don't know enough to comment.
ND: same, but seems like an attention whore.
Sheekee: no opinion
Chloe 75: obvious troll.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
TACM is all woman.
Extremechick is OK. She attentionwhores and starts mindless threads but she doesn't generate a lot of drama.
The rest, feh.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
I can sum it up in one emote:
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
Extreme Chick: vacant
Austin Girl: that's a man, you fuqing morons
Cat: too smart for this shythole
sweetpea: most readable posts
TACM: 
ND:
Sheekee: most pleasant
Chloe 75:
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
peepars: Posted a couple cam-whore worthy pics, flashed her tiny jugs, then used desperate-for-any-female-contact CI neckbeards and manlets for TFB atttention whoring and emotional tampons.
I GAVE MY SON A PURPLE MOWHAWK! HERE ARE SOME PICS! TEE HEE!
\
THAT'S GREAT! GOT ANY MORE TOPLESS PIX?
\
SOON! TEE HEE! NOW HERE ARE SOME PIX OF US MAKING HALLOWEEN COOKIES!
\
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
peepars: Posted a couple cam-whore worthy pics, flashed her tiny jugs, then used desperate-for-any-female-contact CI neckbeards and manlets for TFB atttention whoring and emotional tampons.
I GAVE MY SON A PURPLE MOWHAWK! HERE ARE SOME PICS! TEE HEE!
\
THAT'S GREAT! GOT ANY MORE TOPLESS PIX?
\
SOON! TEE HEE! NOW HERE ARE SOME PIX OF US MAKING HALLOWEEN COOKIES!
\
Forgot about peepars.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
peepars: Posted a couple cam-whore worthy pics, flashed her tiny jugs, then used desperate-for-any-female-contact CI neckbeards and manlets for TFB atttention whoring and emotional tampons.
I GAVE MY SON A PURPLE MOWHAWK! HERE ARE SOME PICS! TEE HEE!
\
Wasn't the mohawk kid Narcolepticfitthrower's?
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
Austingirl is the only surviving hen who's both single and might be good looking.
Cat is a real bitch. I bet she's porked out since that one pic was taken fifteen years ago. Jewesses do not age well.
Peepars is cute but crazy and who knows if she's really separated from her husband, she's a long time troll.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
How could you forget the resident drunk?
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
How could you forget the resident drunk?
I don't think she's actually still here.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
I don't think she's actually still here.
Besides, she's old and ugly.
We need one of the many johns posting to bring some of his whores online to liven things up. That's how we got Infusion on FC.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
sweetpea: most readable posts
\
.disgustinglori.png.
Post regg'd, beautiful flower.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
\
.disgustinglori.png.
Post regg'd, beautiful flower.
Experiment:
Does quoting this show I'm Megadot who posted?
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
\
.disgustinglori.png.
Post regg'd, beautiful flower.
No shyt.
BTW - There are some adorable dot hens. 
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
You forgot the ignorant, quntfaced, drunk, whore kckitty!
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
Experiment:
Does quoting this show I'm Megadot who posted?
The profile link used to show in the page source, that seems to have been fixed. The regs IDing people on the regged board are just guessing. But if it bothers you reg a new moniker every day.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
Extreme Chick:
Sheekee: Awesome.
Austin Girl: :hawt:
Cat: irritating, vicious,
sweetpea/beautiful flower:Beyond boring. No really.
TACM: Interesting but PI collector extrodinaire.
ND: Jury's out. Seemed interesting at first, lately boring attention whore and poo-flinger. Got poo? Fling it, got rumors? STFU. 'Nuff said.
Chloe77: Not enough data. Seems cool though.
Peepars: Love her to deaf. Attention whore for sure, but entertaining.
kckitty: OMG! Where to start? Annoying.
Maria93? Who?
Dottie? Ditto.
Willow? Qunt. Can't remember the last time he saw a vagina.
Asada? Wannabe. Wishes he was a vagina.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
The profile link used to show in the page source, that seems to have been fixed. The regs IDing people on the regged board are just guessing. But if it bothers you reg a new moniker every day.
They're not guessing, mostly. They really are that attention whoring time wasters. Dot posts show up under the reg name (for what it's worth) if they take the time to look up each logged in moniker and then search the post history by using a "list" option. I did it once to figure out how they were doing it, it was beyond boring after that. Some of these motherfuqers have too much time on their hands: Arse, OLG, PL, Spanky seem to be the most concerned and "watcher dot" ies. As I said...some people have too much time on their hands. Make of that what you will.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
Peepars: Love her to deaf. Attention whore for sure, but entertaining.
Jesus, you're pathetic.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
No shyt.
BTW - There are some adorable dot hens.
All dots are by definition nameless, faceless, raceless, and genderless. We are a perfect society.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
No reproducing? 
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
No reproducing?
Righteous trevitude comes at a price.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
Righteous trevitude comes at a price.
I think we should vote on this. 
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
wrote:
Jesus, you're pathetic.
I tried looking for those Peepars bewb pix once, never did find them. However, any hen that shows bewbage to the trevs is ok in my book.
........................................................................
Re: ITT: We discuss what we really think about the CI hens.
BUMPB
........................................................................
Pages: 1 2